IA WRITER FONT CODE

al.) trace their lineage back to the Teletype A33.Ĭheap typewriters had as few separate characters as possible.

IA WRITER FONT CODE

The programmer’s (or code) fonts (Monaco, Source Code Pro, even Duospace, et. Not every monospaced font traces its lineage back to typewriters. This is why I use Teletype-derived writing fonts-of which I find Ubuntu Mono to be the best. Does the font I’m using for writing do everything possible to make errors stand out? Do I have to squint to see errors? Are errors obvious when the print is on the page or the spell checker is off? Since I’m my own publisher, the answers to these have to be “yes,” “no,” and “hell yes,” respectively. I have questions other than the subjective “raw text feel” or the possible “writing pace” issues that are more important to me. Do monospaced fonts slow reading speed? Are there studies? If so, is this really a good thing for writing? Again, are there studies? (More on this later.)Īs for slowing down reading to a “writing pace”…this is a point I’m unwilling to stipulate. It also suffers from indistinct typographic quotes-though it manages to do dashes well. The Duospace font isn’t as aesthetically pleasing to me as iA suggest-I find it mildly annoying that letters don’t line up as in a true monospaced font. I suspect that to younger people a monospaced font just says “old-fashioned.” Finally, they bring up the fact that a monospaced(ish) font makes typos more obvious.įirst, I absolutely agree that a monospaced(ish) font makes typos more obvious, and this is important to me.įurther, I agree that a monospaced font communicates “work in progress”-but then, I grew up with typewriters. They further argue that a monospaced(ish) font slows down reading speed thus forcing a more appropriate writing speed. IA’s arguments are first, that a monospaced (or nearly monospaced) writing font says that “this text is work in progress,” as opposed to a proportional font, which says “this is almost done.” Second, they argue that their new Duospace font (which has 1.5 times the monospaced width for the characters “m”, “M”, “w”, and “W”) maintains that “raw text feel” while avoiding the “artificial mechanical constraints” of the old typewriters. For my own purposes, I find Ubuntu Mono to be the best (free) writing font available. I find iA’s “Papa knows best” attitude towards writing fonts…irritating. (By Bubba73 (Jud McCranie) – Scan of the original photograph ( Own work), CC BY-SA 3.0, Link)I suggest that there is no such thing as a perfect writing font. The grandmother of all computer input & display devices, the Teletype A33. Their introduction post is here, In Search of the Perfect Writing Font. Not too long ago, iA Writer added a new font to its app, iA Writer Duospace font.

Ia writer font